No Love on the Island

Love Island is a broadcasting success for ITV2 – their highest rated programme to date. Most parents with teenagers will have heard of it and probably argued with them about it. Many school children will likely have viewing apps on their phones and be sending messages about it. Half of the three million audience are children or young adults. Teenagers and the so-called “millennials” love this show.

People at your work are discussing it – who they like, who they don’t and who are likely to get together. It’s all over the tabloid newspapers. So you can’t ignore it.

If you are not familiar with Love Island, imagine a debauched version of Big Brother (if you thought that were possible), and you have the general idea. Not for nothing has this dating programme been dubbed “the most vulgar series in TV history”.

The Telegraph describes it as “half a dozen gorgeous young men and women stranded in a gorgeous villa on Majorca basking in gorgeous sunshine. The contestants’ objective is to make sure that they can be a partner to someone of the opposite sex – ‘couple up’ – by the end of each week.” Over the course of the series, contestants can be re-coupled (either by choice or not) and are regularly voted out by the public and new ones brought in, to create new dynamics and coupling opportunities. The last remaining couple (sic) win a prize of £50,000 and the prospect of a new career.

Viewers are treated to lots of Big Brother-style dialogue between participants with plenty of musings on who they need to couple with next, along with arguments, tantrums, gossiping and swearing (because it is, after all, authentic). There are romantic dinners, some love-related games and challenges and, rather bizarrely, filmed sex scenes. Yes, with real people, not actors. It is hard to believe this is allowed to be shown and yet there have been relatively few complaints. In last year’s tawdry series, four couples had sex on TV in just one night.

It is the ultimate peep show, beamed to your living room (or more likely to a mobile device so you can watch in private).

According to the show, the fact that viewers get to see real sex – albeit in badly-lit scenes and covered by duvets or towels – is only a tiny part of the bigger story. They say, “We’re not interested in the act itself, more why the couple have decided to take their relationship to the next stage and how it might impact the rest of the group.” Well that’s OK then.

A typical day on Love Island: Adam, having apparently “coupled” with Rosie (which I believe included sleeping with her) has now an interest in a re-coupling, which involves some kind of romantic interest in Zara; perhaps surprisingly, Rosie is upset about this and cries real tears. It seems that for just one moment she forgets the £50,000 prize money and realises there must be more to life than casual romance and sex; she wants to be loved; she wants a friend. Of course this is a contrived environment and it’s all stage managed but in this abbreviated form it shows how many people conduct their close relationships. And it does not make us happy. We feel her pain, but only for a moment – there are plenty more couplings in the sea.

Possibly the makers really do think we are being treated to a sophisticated social experiment which has genuine merit. More likely, we are just watching men and women, made in the image of God, acting out the suppression of their knowledge of him (Romans 1:18) as they seek pleasure in everything but him. We observe idolaters worshipping the deity Eros – the thrill of romantic love and the momentary satisfaction of consummation, acting no better than brute beasts. And we collude with them as we watch for our titillation. Gone is the pretence that there is any artistic merit to any of this, the voyeuristic devouring of other people’s intimate personal lives, served up as entertainment.

But we cannot be surprised or outraged; the contestants’ behaviour is the product of our society’s sexual revolution that has given permission to behave like this. And why not, if there is no creator God to show us a better way? The programme makers are just doing their job, working within an entertainment industry that has nowhere else to go but further down into the abyss. The reality of real-life conflicts and the shock of seeing the most intimate moment a man and woman can share is irresistible clickbait and successful ratings fodder. Even the sad, untimely and unexplained death this week of Sophie Gradon a former contestant has been headline news and practically part of the franchise. The media has an insatiable appetite for stories about these reality TV stars as they speculate on the cause of Sophie’s death and have the opportunity to publish some more glamorous photos .

Maybe we ourselves long for those beautiful bodies and that carefree behaviour, compared with our seemingly drab existence. Maybe we do enjoy discussing the various characters. But perhaps mostly it is just a way to indulge our appetite for gossip and curiosity about other people’s sex lives.

It is hard not to just sound prudish; I know there are plenty of acted-out sexual scenes that are more graphic in other shows and I could be talking about these instead. Yes, we do need to ask ourselves some hard questions about our general viewing diet, but nonetheless it seems that a further line is being crossed in this programme .

I am trying to think of a legitimate reason why Christians, or their children, should be watching this. Can you help me?

You might say you are not condoning the behaviour on view, but it is hard to watch it and not be affected. You might be able to make genuinely insightful comments, but surely there are better subjects to watch. You might say that it’s not real, it’s all rather contrived which to some degree is true. But most of the show is real, painfully real. You might be appalled at what is happening, but at the same time you are de-sensitising yourself to the reality that these people are engaging in sexual immorality for your entertainment. Even if you do not actually view the “couplings”, you are being fed the lie that sexual intercourse is a natural ingredient of casual, uncommitted relationships between men and women. You are teaching yourself to feel no pain that neither the women or men on this show have any sense of their worth or life’s meaning and denying themselves the delight of a committed, lifelong relationship in which romance, sex, sacrificial love and deep friendship will thrive.

For our children, it models and legitimises the hook-up culture; it cheapens relationships; it leaves them bathing in a shallow pool of putrid water whilst God offers them the pure, deep fountain of life and relationships as he intends, within the church family and within marriage.

Imagine an Island where the contestants are guided and protected by God’s word; where there is romance and love and the ups and downs of misunderstanding and outburst of selfishness; where there is freedom and openness, but also discretion; where a couple only share the same bed when they are committed to sharing their lives in marriage and the bedroom door is closed to all other participants and viewers. It would probably be the least popular show on ITV2.

We need to tell a better story to ourselves and our children. It is a story that says that  beauty, love and intimacy are good things but only within the safe boundaries that God has set. We flourish as human beings when we work with, rather than against, the grain of God’s good purposes for us.

We also need to tell a story of hope, that whatever our conquests or defeats in love, however far from God we have wandered, he is the ultimate spurned lover who seeks us out and wants to forgive and restore us. His is the love we need and therefore the love we should seek. And I can’t see it on this Island.


  1. Agree with most of this article. However you won’t stop people watching what they want. For me the only positive I could make out of it is showing our young people just how shallow the World is and how they should value their morals and not behave like said Love Island Contestants. It just shows how little regard people have for anyone other than themselves. Not someone I would want to be and hopefully not someone my children will want to be. Very similar to Big Brother so if we say Love Island isn’t good for Christians do we say the same for Big brother and any other ‘reality’ tv shows?

    • Reality TV is broad genre and a large part of broadcast TV these days. I guess the question is, what is the programme portraying or encouraging. I don’t think BB has much to commend it, but it’s not about censorship – each of us has to decide.

  2. Thank you, Graham, for a very perceptive comment. I’ve seen only 5 mins of this and that was the first night so only triviality on show. I won’t be deepening my experience unless I have a very good reason to do so. Tony

  3. @Graham – exactly. There are also many non reality shows that contain ‘inappropriate’ material. I think the thing I find most offensive is often how uneducated / unintelligent these people are on the reality shows. It is a sign of the times that so many have no regard for anything other than making money and seeking gratification away from their creator. Lots to pray about for the lost.

    • Hmm. Not sure it’s an educational point or an intellectual issue. I think I would look pretty stupid on TV, it’s part of the way it is all edited. There is a doctor and an engineer on Love Island. It’s more about the cultural air they breathe. But absolutely lots to pray for.

  4. Yes, this programme depicts a society about as far away as you can get from the truth we know from God’s Word and it should make us grieve and fall to our knees to pray for the generation of young people growing up in such a time as this.
    For those of you who have regenerate teenagers and young people who walk a straight path and reject this programme may you praise and thank God for His grace and mercy.
    But this is one of the most watched and talked about programmes on TV at the moment for this demographic and therefore I can think of two reasons why some of God’s people may indeed choose to watch it.
    Firstly, to those who work with young people and want to engage with them “where they’re at” and secondly to the parents who don’t wish to drive their children to secrecy by an outright ban.
    Could it be that these two groups could indeed engage more positively with young people as a result of understanding and exposing the destructive effect of this world’s lies that are laid bare in a programme such as this? Watching this programme with our daughter gave us opportunity we may otherwise not have had to point out the destructive reality of people without God who manipulate and exploit each other for selfish gain. Watching it is indeed a painful experience for us, but we are grateful for opportunities such as this that could be missed by refusing to engage.

    • I think it’s really helpful to debate one another as Christians about this. I have great sympathy for the challenges of teenagers who are pushing the boundaries and I really get that any parent would want to understand the world their children are becoming immersed in. As a church leader I have watched some and read endless tabloid articles about it to get a real sense of the programme and all that goes with it. But I guess the question for me is that once you have got the basic premise and seen it work out in action, what else is there to engage with? The only thing that changes is whose left sleeping with who (or is it “whom”). I am raising but not finally answering the question whether watching it is at all useful or actually corrupting? But it’s a very hard call for parents

  5. Thank you Caroline, really helpful comment

  6. I agree with that Graham. Just to add my point about education / intelligence was after hearing one of the contestants has never heard of ‘brexit’ and another had said something equally ‘ignorant’. If the time they spent on worrying about female or male attention and the way they looked went on other matters that could only be a positive.

  7. Agree Caroline, along the lines of what I was trying to say but I’m not as articulate x

  8. Thanks Graham, I think you’ve articulated the sadness of the situation very well. For myself, I wouldn’t choose to watch Love Island, even for the sake of watching it with teenage children, or to engage with the culture that embraces the program. Paul’s words seem most apt:

    Ephesians 5:8-12 NIV
    For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord. Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret.

    Thank you exposing this darkness. May those of us who are “children of the light” have nothing to do with these fruitless deeds.

  9. This is bringing pornography to the masses, people who would be embarrassed to watch or seek out porn films etc.
    I have not watched, and do not intend to, but from what I have read and heard, it is de-sensitising People and perhaps giving them the idea that this behaviour is ok or normal.
    I sincerely hope that this is not placing pressure on those wishing to save themselves for their future partner in marriage, but I fear it is, as it makes it look normal.
    The bible refers to leading people astray, in Matthew chapter 9 “And whosoever shall cause one of these little ones that believe in me to stumble, it were better for him if a great millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea” the message is clear for those who want to hear.
    Who is the arbiter of standards, surely this is leading people astray, who will take the responsibility of leading our nation further into depravity.
    I fear this type of programme will make the pressures on our youngsters to have casual sexual relationships all the more.
    Will this normalisation of such behaviour increase the number of rapes or attempted rapes all the more numerous?
    There is plenty of evidence to suggest that the media influences peoples actions are rarely for the better

  10. For everyone engaging in discussion over this, I really recommend Mary Whitehouse’s book Quite Contrary. It’s dated now, but the principles are the same. I’ve got a copy if anyone wants to borrow it.

Leave a Comment